Exploring the numbers, transparency, and real-world outcomes for traders
In the world of proprietary trading, numbers matter. Traders want to know which platform can provide them with real funding opportunities, verified performance, and a fair path to success. While many platforms claim to offer the best funding conditions, the reality often lies in the data they provide. That’s why the discussion around Why PropFunding’s stats beat PropFirmMatch is so critical.
This article will dive deep into both platforms, comparing their models, statistics, and transparency. You’ll learn which platform offers better opportunities, more actionable insights, and clearer chances for success. If you’ve ever wondered how the two compare in actual trader outcomes, this is the guide for you.
Understanding the Two Platforms
Before we dive into statistics and performance, it’s important to understand what each platform actually does and how it operates.
PropFunding: A True Performance-Based Model
PropFunding is a proprietary trading firm that allows traders to earn funded accounts based on performance, not upfront payments. Its model is designed to be fair, transparent, and trader-friendly. Key features include:
- No fees to start the challenge
- Two-step evaluation to ensure consistent results
- Only paying a one-time activation fee after passing the evaluation
- Profit splits that allow traders to keep up to 80-90% of earnings
- Real-time funding with a cohort-based system
This approach ensures that ambitious traders can focus on trading rather than worrying about high entry fees or unclear conditions. The funding is directly tied to real performance, making the platform extremely reliable for serious traders.
PropFirmMatch: A Comparison and Discovery Tool
In contrast, PropFirmMatch is not a funding platform. It is a comparison platform for proprietary trading firms. It provides:
- Detailed listings of hundreds of prop firms
- Information about challenge rules, profit splits, and payout terms
- Verified reviews from traders
- Industry-wide statistics for many firms
PropFirmMatch’s main value is helping traders research and compare options rather than offering direct funding. While useful for exploration, it does not provide centralized performance stats for individual traders or cohorts.
This distinction is key when understanding Why PropFunding’s stats beat PropFirmMatch. One platform is focused on performance outcomes, while the other aggregates data from many firms without direct control.
How PropFunding Publishes Real Performance Data
A major advantage of PropFunding is its transparency and performance reporting. Unlike other platforms, it openly shares real data from funded traders, which makes planning easier.
Verified Trader Statistics
PropFunding provides clear, actionable data, such as:
- Average Phase 1 pass rate: 41%
- Average Phase 2 pass rate: 27%
- Average monthly payout for funded traders: $4,800
- Highest individual payout recorded: $29,500
- Active funded traders: Over 30,000
These statistics are published to help traders understand their chances of success and the potential financial outcomes. The numbers are not estimates or aggregated from external firms; they reflect actual trader results.
Cohort-Based Funding Model
PropFunding’s cohort system is another reason its stats stand out. Each month, a set number of traders are funded based on performance. The top performers are given priority funding, and unsuccessful traders are automatically entered into the next cohort at no additional cost. This method:
- Ensures a fair and structured funding process
- Provides predictable statistics for pass rates and payouts
- Motivates traders to perform at their best
This system supports actionable insights, showing traders the real likelihood of passing and earning payouts.
What PropFirmMatch Offers
PropFirmMatch provides a different type of value. While it does not fund traders directly, it is a comprehensive database and comparison platform for prop firms.
Strengths of PropFirmMatch
- Provides data on hundreds of prop firms
- Lists challenge terms, profit splits, and payout conditions
- Offers verified trader reviews
- Displays industry-wide payout totals
Limitations in Real Performance Metrics
PropFirmMatch does not report:
- Real pass rates for traders across all firms
- Average individual payouts
- Active funded trader statistics
Essentially, PropFirmMatch can show the size of the industry and the total payouts firms make, but it cannot provide the predictable, individual-level statistics that PropFunding does.
This makes a key point clear: Why PropFunding’s stats beat PropFirmMatch. When a trader wants to evaluate their own chances of success, PropFunding’s real numbers are far more useful than PropFirmMatch’s aggregated industry data.
The Importance of Transparency
Transparency is one of the most important factors for traders evaluating prop trading platforms. Without it, making informed decisions is nearly impossible.
PropFunding Transparency
PropFunding’s transparency extends beyond statistics. Traders know exactly:
- The number of active funded traders
- The likelihood of passing each evaluation phase
- The payout amounts they can expect if funded
- How profit splits work and what portion they can retain
This information allows traders to plan strategically, reducing uncertainty and providing a clear path to funded trading.
PropFirmMatch Transparency
PropFirmMatch is transparent in its way. It offers clear data on firm rules, payouts, and trader reviews. However, it does not provide:
- Centralized performance metrics
- Detailed success rates for traders
- Average earnings of funded accounts
For traders looking for predictable outcomes, this makes PropFunding the preferred choice, which supports the assertion that Why PropFunding’s stats beat PropFirmMatch.
Comparing Pass Rates
One of the clearest ways to understand the difference is by examining pass rates and funding outcomes.
PropFunding
- Provides real pass rates for each phase of its evaluation
- Pass rates are published monthly and can be tracked over time
- High-performing traders can anticipate their chances of funding
- Offers repeat entry for unsuccessful traders at no extra cost
PropFirmMatch
- Lists challenge terms but does not track actual pass rates
- Provides total payouts of firms but not probability metrics for individual traders
- Useful for comparison but not for evaluating personal chances of success
Traders seeking a data-driven approach will naturally gravitate to PropFunding because of the clarity and predictability in its stats.
Real-World Trader Outcomes
Numbers are important, but what really matters is the impact on traders’ lives.
PropFunding Impact
- Real payouts allow traders to make a living
- Clear pass rates enable strategic planning
- Structured cohorts improve predictability
- Transparent profit splits encourage high performance
Many traders have moved from struggling in challenges with other firms to consistent success on PropFunding due to its performance-based model.
PropFirmMatch Impact
PropFirmMatch helps traders find firms that may suit their trading style or risk appetite. However:
- It cannot guarantee funding or outcomes
- Success depends on the chosen prop firm, not PropFirmMatch itself
- Data is aggregated, making it difficult to plan personal strategies
While PropFirmMatch is a useful research tool, it does not provide the same actionable insights as PropFunding.
Why PropFunding’s Stats Beat PropFirmMatch
Here is a clear breakdown of why PropFunding’s statistics are superior for traders:
- Actionable Metrics – PropFunding provides real pass rates, payouts, and active trader data, giving traders information they can act on.
- Direct Performance Data – PropFunding’s numbers reflect actual trader outcomes, unlike PropFirmMatch’s aggregated firm statistics.
- Predictability – Cohort-based funding provides structured chances to pass and earn payouts.
- Transparency – PropFunding publishes all relevant stats openly, allowing traders to make informed decisions.
- Trader-Centric Model – Funding is tied to performance, and traders keep most of their profits.
In short, for traders seeking clarity, real results, and predictable funding, PropFunding is far more reliable, which directly explains Why PropFunding’s stats beat PropFirmMatch.
Additional Advantages of PropFunding
Beyond statistics, PropFunding has several features that improve the overall trading experience:
- No upfront fees – lowers the barrier for entry for ambitious traders
- Two-phase evaluation – ensures consistency and risk management
- Cohort-based funding – provides fair and predictable funding schedules
- Profit sharing up to 90% – maximizes trader earnings
- Active trader community – facilitates learning and mentorship
These features contribute to better outcomes, making the platform more effective than simply using a comparison site like PropFirmMatch.
Conclusion
While both PropFunding and PropFirmMatch serve important roles, the differences are clear:
- PropFunding delivers real, verified performance stats and funding outcomes. It provides traders with actionable insights, predictable results, and a clear path to profit.
- PropFirmMatch is an excellent tool for researching prop firms and comparing terms, but it lacks centralized performance metrics and detailed trader success data.
For anyone serious about proprietary trading, the real numbers matter more than aggregated statistics, and that is precisely why PropFunding’s stats beat PropFirmMatch.
Traders looking for transparency, predictable outcomes, and maximum profit potential will find that PropFunding offers the best combination of real-world data, structure, and financial opportunity.
If your goal is to succeed as a trader and make informed decisions based on actual performance metrics, PropFunding is the platform that provides clarity, guidance, and measurable results every step of the way.